Selected Songs



Analyzing a Written Argument
The general argument made by Bob Dylan in his work Selected Songs is that we believe that because we have God on our side he will help us with war. He also talks about others who fight in wars just for their own personal gain. More specifically Dylan suggests that if God was on someone’s side in war then he would prevent future wars. He writes, “If God’s on our side he’ll stop the next war.”  Pg. 916. In this passage, Dylan is suggesting that the fact that we are still going to war mean that God isn’t on our side. In conclusion, it is Dylan’s belief that being in war at all is a sign that God doesn’t approve of what we are doing.
Planning Your Own Argument
            In my view, Dylan is right because war isn’t a good thing and God only stands for good things. For example, there have been many wars and battles fought in the name of God but that doesn’t mean he approves of them. One example of this is the holy wars where many people were killed, “in the name of God.” All of the death and destruction was proof that God didn’t favor what they were doing. Therefore, I conclude that we wouldn’t be in war if God was actually on our side.

The Battle of Balaclava: The Charge of the Light Brigade


Analyzing a Written Argument
The general argument made by William Howard Russell in his work The Battle of Balaclava: The Charge of the Light Brigade is that he was very proud of the way that the brigade fought off the Russians that outnumbered them. More specifically Russell suggests that they were heroic and patriotic in their acts. He writes, “We saw them riding through the guns, as I have said; to our delight, we saw them returning, after breaking through a column of Russian infantry.”  Pg. 837. In this passage, Russell is suggesting that those who saw the brigade returning rejoiced because they were able to defeat their enemies. In conclusion, it is Russell’s belief that through war you can make your country proud and accomplish amazing feats.
Planning Your Own Argument
            In my view, Russell is right because it has often been war heroes and generals that have lead large groups of people all throughout time because of their popularity because of the honor they get form great feats in war. For example, in the movie kingdom of heaven Balian earns great respect because of his skills in warfare. Although Russell might object that Balian also got the respect because of his father, I maintain that it was his skills in warfare. Therefore, I conclude that war can gain one great honor and power.

International Film Critique



1.      Title of film:

Princess Mononoke

2.      Year of release:

July 12, 1997

3.      Language of the original film:

Japanese

4.      Director:

Hayao Miyazaki

5.      Actors:

Billy Crudup, Claire Danes, Gillian Anderson, Minnie Driver, Billy Bob Thornton, Jada Pinkett Smith, Keith David, John DiMaggio, John DeMita, Tara Strong, and Debi Derryberry.

6.      Give a brief plot summary.

The main character Ashitaka was attacked by the great boar spirit Naga. Because of his encounter and fight with Naga Ashitaka was left with a demon mark on his arm. The tribal wise lady told him that he would die no matter what. She then told him it would be best to leave the village and never return. Ashitaka then leaves on a journey in order to find the spirit of the forest. He hopes that the spirit of the forest who takes life and gives life will know what he should do with the rest of his life. On his way to find the forest spirit Ashitaka encounters a town called Iron Town. In this town he meets the leader named Lady Eboshi. Lady Eboshi has created Iron Town when no one else wanted it and turned it into a productive iron smith. By doing this the emperor becomes envious of the iron and sends and attack raid to destroy Iron Town. Lady Eboshi isn’t worried about the empire that wants her iron, she is only worried about the forest gods that are attacking Iron Town. Princess Mononoke (San) has declaired she is going to kill Lady Eboshi for destroying the forest. During this time the Boar tribe decide they are going to attack Iron town in an attempt to stop them from destroying the forest. The residents of Iron town defeat the Boar tribe and use their skins to convince their blind leader to lead them to the forest spirit. One he leads them there Lady Eboshi decapitates the forest spirit that then turns into a black mass that kills anything it touches in an attempt to get its head back. After following Lady Eboshi San and Ashitaka are able to stop her and give the forest spirit its head back. The forest spirit then heals Ashitaka and the forest returns to life.

7.      Analyze the social and philosophical issues the film addresses. Make sure you include the point of view of the movie, the context of the movie, what audience the movie is targeting, and why.

The big issue that the movie addresses is the relationship between nature and humans. The humans of Iron Town want to chop down trees to heat the forges to forge their iron while the spirit gods of the forest are trying to drive them away and rebuild the forest. The Ape tribe wants to eat the humans so they can plant more trees and rebuild the forest. The Wolf tribe wants to kill Lady Eboshi. Also the Boar tribe wants them gone and wants to attack Iron Town in an attempt to drive them away. The humans want to destroy the spirit of the forest so that the spirit gods will become regular animals and leave them alone as they mine their iron. An even bigger problem is that the guns that Lady Eboshi and her town use in order to fight the animals leave the bullets in the spirit gods and turn them into demons. The demons don’t care about anything and have super strength and want to kill everything they come across. It was because of this that Naga was turned into a demon and attacked Ashitaka’s town. This lead to him receiving super demon strength. Ashitaka used this super demon strength to become the mediator between the humans and the spirit gods. When San came to Iron Town to kill Lady Eboshi, he stopped their fight and brought San to safety. Ashitaka came to take the stand where he believes that the humans and the forest gods could live together in harmony. Throughout the course of the movie he is constantly trying to convince both the humans and the spirit gods to live together instead of fighting. This theme of humans and nature living together in harmony is the main theme of the movie. From this we can learn that it is possible to have humans and the land live together if neither tries to destroy the other. There are also other sub themes such as the dangers of greediness. Jigo, who is a monk, is working with Lady Eboshi in order to kill the forest spirit so that he can bring the head to the Emperor. He does this because the Emperor promises a mountain of gold to anyone who can make him live forever. He also believe that the spirit of the forest’s head can make you live forever because it is the god of life and death. For this reason Jigo decides that he is going to help Lady Eboshi kill the spirit of the forest and get its head to receive a mountain of gold from the Emperor. He doesn’t care that taking the spirit of the forest’s head will turn it into a wrathful god that kills everything until it gets its head back and that the forest will die without it. It was only Ashitaka and San who catch him and force him to give the head back that makes him finally see that what he did was wrong. This is important because it teaches us to not be greedy or it could lead to the death of many innocent people and to nature. We have to learn from Jigo’s mistakes and not make them ourselves.

8.      What is your response to the message of the film? Why do you respond this way?

My response the message of this film was that I agreed with it. I think that humans and nature can live together in harmony. They just have to try to get along with each other. The biggest problem in this relationship is the humans.  The biggest problem is that the humans are destroying the forest which is the animal’s home. The animals fight back in order to protect their home but this just makes the humans even angrier and then they retaliate and kill the animals. I think that the animals and nature could give up some land to the humans and in return the humans not destroy the forest and kill the animals. I find that if humans and nature work together they can not only not destroy each other but bring out the best of each other. Humans can use their knowledge in order to help heal plants and animals and make them grow better. Nature and animals can provide good and healthy food sources for humans along with giving them a wonderful place to live, explore, and enjoy. Together humans and nature can live in a mutually beneficial relationship. As for the greed portion of the film I think that no one should be greedy. Greed always makes me think of the capitol in the Hunger Games. It makes me think how they would greedily horde all of the riches and food for themselves and make the districts live in terrible conditions, practically as slaves barely surviving off of their meager earnings.

9.      What cultural differences did you notice about the film?

I noticed that there were a lot of cultural differences from our movies. Even from the beginning the outfits and building that they live in are far different from any American clothing or dwellings. They often wear a lot more layers of clothing than we ever have here. They also use face masks pretty often when I can’t think of any Americans who cover their faces with masks. The buildings were primitive, wooden, and tall. While the movie was set in an old time period the buildings still were far different from any American buildings. As the movie progresses you also saw them eating Japanese food and it is different from any American food. They also used chop sticks which is a very Asian chose of utensil. Another big difference from American films that I noticed was the amount of violence that it had. There was a lot of decapitation and chopping off of limbs in the movie that I don’t think would be allowed in American movies unless there was a higher rating on the movie. Another difference that I found was that women had many positions of leadership in this movie. In an American film this would be very rare or nonexistent because America is a male dominated society. I am not sure if all Japanese movies portray women in a position of power or if it was just that one. I found that the Japanese have a very different set of customs and values that they put into their movies than what we put into our movies.

10.  What techniques did the filmmaker use that were different from what you see in the films you normally watch?

The techniques used in this movie were very different from those of usual American movies especially since it was an anime. Even compared to American cartoons it was very different. In the anime the screen moves a lot different from how I was used to and it took some time to get adjusted to. There would often be sections were the screen would look around like a giant panorama. It would also do these crazy zooms that look weird and took time to get used to. The anime was also very fast and sometimes hard to follow. It was also interesting to see the difference in an anime in comparison to a cartoon. In anime there was a lot more attention to detail. There were complex light patterns that came into play along with shadows of trees that wouldn’t be added in a cartoon because it would have been a lot of work for pretty much nothing. It was interesting to see how all of these details and light patterns were added with such intricacy while in an American cartoon they wouldn’t even be there.

11.  Why do you think I assign a foreign film?

I think that you had us watch foreign films in order to further understand other cultures. By having us watch other cultures movies it exposes us to how they think in their daily lives and they customs that they have. This is probably one of the best ways to study the humanities because it can easily show a people’s beliefs including during different time periods by older or newer movies.

A: What a Billionaire Should Give



What Should a Billionaire Give?

Analyzing a Written Argument

The general argument made by Peter Singer in his work What Should a Billionaire Give is that some people live in immense wealth while others fight to survive on very little money. More specifically Singer suggests that the rich should give more money because they have much more than they need. He writes, “Philanthropy on this scale raises many ethical questions: Why are the people who are giving doing so? Does it do any good? Should we praise them for giving so much or criticize them for not giving still more? Pg. 805. In this passage, Singer is suggesting that while very rich philanthropists are donating lots of money they might not be donating enough. In conclusion, it is Singer’s belief that while rich philanthropists donate a lot of money by other’s standards, but that doesn’t mean that they are donating enough because they have so much more than everyone else.

Planning Your Own Argument

            In my view, Singer is right because I believe that some people shouldn’t own many mansions and private jets and all these toys when there are people who are starving to death and could have been saved by the money spent of the toys. For example, in the Hunger Games the residence live in wealth and comfort while the residents of the districts are barely surviving on their small amounts of food that they work all day to get. Although Singer might object that we can necessarily tell the people with all the money what to do, I maintain that what they are doing is just as cruel as what the capitol does to the districts in the Hunger Games. Therefore, I conclude that the rich should share a lot more of their wealth than they do.

Cultural Activity #3: Music/Theater

Cultural Activity #3: Music/Theater
1. What musical event did you attend? (provide the location, name of musicians, titles of songs)
I went to the Utah Musical Symphony group. The concert was on November 29, 2011. It was located at Murray High School in the auditorium. The director’s name was Vladimir Kulenovic.
2. Give a summary or description of the work you heard. (at least 150 words)
The director was very informing about the beat of the music. He had the audience listen to the temp of the music and try to understand the different times the kept the music. He talked about the difference of 4/4 time and ¾ time along with the difference of 5/8 time. The director also had the audience listen to the quick tempos that we heard in the song Shostakovich symphony number five. He had us note the much faster paced tempo in comparison to the slower tempo in Beethoven’s symphony number eight. He also had us pay attention to the changing tempos in Shostakovich’s symphony number five. He noted that the tempo switches from Duplo time to 5/8 time. The was all very entertaining to listen to since I have a background knowledge of music from the three years that I was in band which made me know what the different times meant and know what to look for in changing times and tempos.
3. Would you say that this was a poor/fair/good/high quality performance? Why? Justify your answer. Did you notice any mistakes or other problems that detracted from the performance? (150 words)
I would say the performance was a high quality performance. You could tell that the performers were very professional by the attire they wore i.e. suits for the men and dresses for the women. Also by the way that they that they sat with correct posture and behaved very professional. I have seen them once before at Abravanel Hall. I think that the performance was a little better in Abravanel Hall because of the better acoustics and fancier atmosphere but they still did a fabulous job at Murray High School. The only thing that really detracted from the performance was the high school students that were talking during the course of the performance. Their talking would interrupt the music and detract from its greatness. I never heard any mistakes from the performers and you could tell that they practice all the time. Even the solos didn’t have any mistakes which is even harder to do because you are singled out and makes you more likely to make a mistake.
4. What did you find out about the background of the works, composers, artists, or others connected to this production? (100 words)
I found out that the symphony was founded in 1940. The symphony performs worldwide and plays songs from artists such as Adams, Beethoven, Schumann, Mozart, Shostakovich, Stravinsky, Walton, and many others. All the works performed by the Utah Symphony are considered to be great American works. Abravanel Hall, which they perform in, is considered to be one of the world’s greatest concert halls. Abravanel Hall has won awards for superb architecture and extraordinary acoustics. The Symphony also participates in Utah’s annual productions at the Salt Lake Capitol Theater. Funding from the state makes it possible for the Symphony to perform for over 55,000 students every years all throughout the state.
5. What was your personal reaction to this performance? (250 words)
I thought that this was a great performance by the Utah Symphony. They were very professional and they sounded really good. I really liked being able to relate to the Symphony. I played trumpet in band for three years and I really enjoyed listening to the trumpets perform in the Symphony. I really liked the song where the trumpets had some solo time and I was able to listen to them and how they were able to hit notes with perfect pitch that were really high with ease. This was incredible some to the notes they were playing I am pretty sure that they couldn’t even hit those notes let alone be able to play them with perfection and ease. All of the performers were seasoned and never made a mistake as far as I could tell. I also loved to be able to recall old memories of being in band. I was able to think about the different times and tempos that our music was set to because the director singled out the time and tempo to the audience. This performance made me think of some of my favorite songs from band such as magma, phantom of the opera, crazy train, Ventura Avenue, Del Toro, and many other great songs. One of the songs that were performed reminded me of part of the song Imperial March from Star Wars. I also was wondering why the Symphony was playing for high schools because they needed to be able to afford travel and other expenses but then when I looked them up online I found out that the government pays them to go and play for the high schools which I thought was cool.
6. Would you recommend this performance or musical group to others? Why or Why not? (100 words)
I would recommend this performance for others to listen to. They did a great job with their performance and I think that anyone who enjoys music would enjoy this performance. I especially would suggest this to anyone in band or music classes because they talk about music terms and they play songs from great American classics such as Adams, Beethoven, Schumann, Mozart, Shostakovich, Stravinsky, Walton, and many others. Another reason that I would recommend the Utah Symphony is because they were really good at the songs they performed. They had obviously practiced for many hours and knew the songs very well.
7. Would you enjoy attending this type of event again? Why or why not? (100 words)
I would enjoy attending this type of even again. I would like to because I could hear more of their songs. I would be able to see more of their songs that they didn’t play for the high school because of their lack of time during the assembly. I would enjoy being able to listen to the extreme skill of the artists in their works. It is always fun to be able to see others share their talents with others for their enjoyment. This is part of why I love photography because I can share my views and art with the world. The Symphony was just artists of music instead of light.

Art Project



In our individual art projects we had to have some kind of art which related to one of our readings. I choose the reading "Walden Pond" by Henry David Thoraeu. My picture related to this reading by the lone leaf that stands out among the others. The was this relates to the text is that Thoreau encourages everyone to stand up and think as an individual. He especially says this in regards to the governments actions such as the slavery of African Americans.

Individual PowerPoint

That D@mned Fence




That D@mned Fence

Analyzing a Written Argument

The general argument made by Anonymous in his work That D@mned Fence is that the person thinks that it is ridiculous that they are put behind a fence for security reasons. More specifically Anonymous suggests that they were placed behind the fence for crimes they didn’t commit. He writes, “To keep us penned up behind that d@mned fence, is someone’s notion of national defense!” Pg. 745. In this passage, Anonymous is suggesting that just because someone thought that the Japanese Americans were a threat to national defense they were locked up behind a fence. In conclusion, it is Anonymous’s belief that it wasn’t their fault that they were locked up behind the fence and they don’t deserve to be.

Planning Your Own Argument

            In my view, Anonymous is right because the Japanese Americans didn’t deserve to be locked up behind a fence. For example, this is similar to how the Jews were locked up and put in concentration camps in World War II. Although Anonymous might object that it wasn’t quite as bad as it was with the Jews, I maintain that the taking away of freedom is bad no matter what. Therefore, I conclude that the Japanese Americans were treated like the Jews were during World War II.

To the Lady


To the Lady
Analyzing a Written Argument
The general argument made by Mitsuye Yamada in her work To the Lady is that she should have done something about being brought to an internment camps. More specifically Yamada suggests that if she would have made some attempt to refuse going to an internment camp then someone would have done something about it. She writes, “Should’ve screamed bloody murder like Kitty Genovese then YOU would’ve come to my aid in shining armor.” Pg. 744. In this passage, Yamada is suggesting that it was her fault that she was sent to an internment camp because she didn’t protest it. In conclusion, it is Yamada’s belief that because they didn’t draw the line anywhere, all were punished.
Planning Your Own Argument
             In my view, Yamada is right because no one could expect something to be done about something that no one has rebelled against or rejected. For example, Yamada could have done any of the things that she suggested in her poem to take a stand against being sent to an internment camp. Therefore, I conclude that people need to take a stand for what they believe in and make sure that what they want is known to others so they don’t miss out on what they want.

Citizen 13660



From Citizen 13660

Analyzing a Written Argument

The general argument made by Mine Okubo in her work From Citizen 13660 is that the Nisei didn’t think that they would be sent to internment camps. More specifically Okubo suggests that she was very surprised that she was sent to an internment camp when she was a US citizen. She writes, “It was a real blow when everyone, regardless of citizenship, was ordered to evacuate.” Pg. 748. In this passage, Okubo is suggesting that all the Japanese Americans were resenting there relocation and the lack of privacy and poor treatment they received. In conclusion, it is Okubo’s belief that the Japanese Americans shouldn’t have been relocated if they were citizens of the United States.

Planning Your Own Argument

            In my view, Okubo is wrong because the government relocated them not only for national defense but also for their own protection from angry US citizens. For example, there were many US citizens who attacked Japanese Americans because of the attack on Pear Harbor.. Although Okubo might object that they had no right to relocate them, I maintain that they were trying to do what was best for the Japanese Americans and the Nation. Therefore, I conclude that while the government should have thought of a better plan to protect the nation and the Japanese Americans, they did the best they could.